Views » November 4, 2015
20 Years After the Million Man March, Louis Farrakhan Can Still Draw A Crowd—And Make Media Uneasy
The 82-year old Nation of Islam leader filled the National Mall in October. Why didn’t the media take much notice?
There were several celebrities in attendance—Snoop Dogg, Russell Simmons, Puff Daddy, Common, Dave Chappelle—revealing Farrakhan’s increasing acceptance among the entertainment elite
Americans filled the National Mall in October for no other reason than they were called to do so by Minister Louis Farrakhan, the 82-year old leader of the Nation of Islam (NOI). That chain of causation is remarkable on its face, but what’s even more remarkable is that this is the second time the controversial leader has summoned such a huge crowd. Yet there is a puzzling absence of media analyses examining the allure of this octogenarian firebrand.
Last April, soon after Farrakhan announced NOI’s plans to commemorate the original Million Man March’s 20th anniversary, the group began publicizing the event as a Justice or Else rally. NOI clearly sought to capitalize on black America’s anger and dismay at the proliferation of police killings of black people. NOI and other supporters mounted a grassroots effort with no corporate sponsors, few establishment endorsements and little promotion in mainstream media. Farrakhan began appearing with hip-hop stars like Young Thug, Ice Cube and Eminem, and materializing on broadcasts popular with youth like The Breakfast Club (on Power 105.1 FM New York City) and Sway in the Morning (on SiriusXM’s Shade 45).
“We utilized a lot of social media, as well as youth-oriented broadcasts and websites to help get the word out,” explains Richard Muhammad, editor of NOI’s The Final Call.
The hard edge and implicit menace of the “or else” message seemed designed to tantalize the young and the reckless. And, in fact, several right-wing media sites interpreted Farrakhan’s message as a call for violence. The Council of Conservative Citizens’ website, for example, headlined the gathering this way: “Farrakhan greenlights violence, calls for racial holy war at massive rally.” Although it was an opportunistic interpretation, they heard Farrakhan’s hint.
In contrast to the 1995 march, which was limited to black men, this gathering welcomed women and summoned a diverse array of ethnicities. Native peoples and Latinos were prominently featured among the speakers. Panoramic photos of the gathering reveal dense crowds stretching from the steps of the U.S. Capitol along the length of the National Mall. Although mainstream media placed attendance in the thousands or tens of thousands, the estimates by eyewitnesses and African-American press were at least several hundred thousand. The Rev. Jamal Bryant of Baltimore, a veteran organizer and logistics whiz who helped convene the march, thinks attendance was over a million.
“It is incredible the number of young people who showed up for this march,” said Tamika Mallory of Justice League NYC, a group responsible for many of the anti-police violence mobilizations in the New York area, which also played a large role in organizing the event. Rather than an atmosphere of austere activism, the march cultivated a spirit of playful struggle, with ubiquitous music and spoken word performances sprinkled through the massive crowd.
There were several celebrities in attendance—Snoop Dogg, Russell Simmons, Puff Daddy, Common, Dave Chappelle—revealing Farrakhan’s increasing acceptance among the entertainment elite, but the paparazzi took a pass. One of the few outlets to provide extensive coverage was NewsOne, an affiliate of the black-owned, Washington-based Radio One network.
The mainstream media’s aversion to Farrakhan is a product of many things, not least the barb of his indictments. Farrakhan is an articulate spokesman for black America’s justifiable grievances, and white Americans are deeply implicated. White guilt is not a good media draw. Farrakhan has also earned an anti-Semitic reputation.
Progressive media was not much better than its corporate counterpart in covering this story. White progressives also have a Farrakhan-aversion, and frankly, that’s understandable. Occasionally Farrakhan dips into racial vitriol to burnish his firebrand credentials. His faith-based conservatism also gives secularists pause. He managed to throw anti-abortion and respectability politics into his National Mall speech.
The enduring mystery of Farrakhan is his ability to attract support from black America’s wide ideological spectrum despite his reactionary subtext. Few could name a black leader other than Farrakhan capable of convening these massive gatherings. That capacity is the product of his unique and enduring charisma, and his position as leader of the only group seen to be utterly devoted to black America’s survival.
What do you want to see from our coverage of the 2020 presidential candidates?
As our editorial team maps our plan for how to cover the 2020 Democratic primary, we want to hear from you:
It only takes a minute to answer this short, three-question survey, but your input will help shape our coverage for months to come. That’s why we want to make sure you have a chance to share your thoughts.
Salim Muwakkil is a senior editor of In These Times, where he has worked since 1983. He is the host of The Salim Muwakkil show on WVON, Chicago's historic black radio station, and he wrote the text for the book HAROLD: Photographs from the Harold Washington Years.
if you like this, check out:
- Hawai‘i’s Managed Retreat Proposal Offers an Early Model for Relocation—At a Cost
- Why the NCAA Should Pay Student-Athletes—And Let Them Unionize
- We Were Against ICE Before It Existed
- Filing Your Taxes Is Already Difficult. The House Just Passed a Bill That Keeps It That Way Forever.
- Why You Shouldn’t Listen to Self-Serving Optimists Like Hans Rosling and Steven Pinker